Latest Videos

Emirates' upgrade tips


Emirates' check-in staff have seen every upgrade trick in the book. The airline's latest series of ads takes a light-hearted look at these plucky ploys and suggests simply upgrading to a better airline

16 January, 2018

New Yorkers' thoughts on wi-fi


Honeywell and Inmarsat sent a reporter on to the streets of New York to ask people about their experiences of using inflight wi-fi, and what they really want from connectivity

01 December, 2017

Visit Our YouTube Channel

Read Latest Issue

There are several drivers of long-haul business class seating design. Which of these factors you view as the most important? 

Supplier Spotlight

Join our
LinkedIn Group

Industry Opinion

« back to blog listings

Sexism in aerospace

Women have smaller brains on average. Therefore they should only stay at home and take care of children and the household.

Sounds outdated, doesn’t it? Studies have proved that the size of the brain cannot be directly linked to IQ. But there was a time, not so long ago, where this fact was used – mostly by men – to justify sexual discrimination.

Luckily today we know better. Women are as smart as men, and they are capable of not just work, but also heavy work, and highly intellectual work. Indeed three black, female mathematicians were an essential part of the 1960s NASA space program.

So women should be ok these days. No more sexual discrimination. We are allowed to work, to vote, to be a star of a multimillion dollar superhero movie.

Why then are still just a few women able to find roles in the aerospace industry sector? That was the online poll question that was put to readers of Aircraft Interiors International magazine a few weeks ago: "Why do you think there is still such a small proportion of female engineers in aviation?"

59% of voters were convinced that the imbalance is due to biological reasons. Women are just inherently just not interested in airplanes, or technical work in general, as men. Perhaps they’d rather do something something more social or creative: fashion maybe.

I however, as a female engineer working in the aerospace industry, clicked on another option: 'Because of sexual discrimination', and apparently only 13% of voters agreed with me.

Despite the graphs I believe that actually the 13% were right, not the 59%. Mostly males work in the aerospace sector, and therefore mostly men receive the newsletter and vote on the poll. And if mostly men voted, they would say they have greater interest in the sector than females.

And this is the answer to why such a smaller proportion of women are working in the aerospace sector! Because as a female engineer you first have to prove yourself, because men don’t believe in females' capacity and technical talent. Because it is hard for women to be taken seriously.

Male candidates being chosen over female candidates for roles is just one side of sexual discrimination. But it starts before then with the surprised look we always get when we introduce ourselves as engineers: “Oh, that's rare!”, people say.

And then of course there are the regular jokes and comments: would we rather have our tools in pink?, or how much better we’d look, if we just smiled more. Most of these men are not trying to be offensive. But just as a side-note, if you ever have the urge to make a joke about your female co-worker, just remember that she has most likely heard that joke before. Actually, she has definitely heard it before. All of the jokes. So just drop it.

This blog is not about getting revenge on every guy who ever made an inappropriate joke to me or about me. This is about trying to make males in aerospace look at women from a different angle. We just want to be seen as your co-worker, your employee, your supervisor – not as “the woman”. Don’t judge female colleagues because of their gender: judge them based on skills (and of course same of course applies for skin color, religion, sexual orientation, etc).

And not to start a whole discussion about gender equality and gender-based education, but I believe if we raised our girls with greater access to building toys like Lego Technic, they will grow more interest in engineering. You can’t give your sons Lego and your daughters Barbie and then wonder why more men choose a technical career. Interest is, to a huge extent, formed by how we are brought up.

So, as a suggestion, next time you change the wheel on your bike, or do some maintenance on your car, or build a treehouse, ask your daughters, granddaughters, nieces to help you. They will find their passion (or maybe not – and that's ok) and they might become an aerospace engineer. And why wouldn’t women also be interested in one of the most sophisticated and astonishing engineering products in the world: the airplane.


31 August 2017


I find the blog's statement that the majority vote was 'wrong' to be offensive. Option one was not 'Women are not interested' nor 'Women are not capable'. It merely stated that there was 'Greater male interest' in the sector, and this is borne out by the demographic of women that apply for engineering jobs. We have women engineers at work. Our chief engineer is a woman. Nobody questions their ability and they are paid the same as their male peers.

I am offended because this blog suggests that all men in aviation are ancient cronies living in the days before the suffragettes.

Paul Hone, Zodiac Aerospace

Some years ago I was giving remarks to a general assembly of an Americas MRO conference, with perhaps 500+ people in the audience. The various breakout sessions included the issue of unverified component removals, or some such issue that has pestered all operators from the beginning of time.

I made some comment, perhaps unkindly, that one would think we'd have solved this problem by now. An audience member challenged me as to what I thought the problem was.

I answered by asking all the women in the room to stand up. There were perhaps a couple of dozen, tops.

I simply said, "There's your answer".

I fear there was too much testosterone in the room for most to 'get it', but many did.

R Gene House, MRO veteran

If you would like to post a comment about this blog, please click here.

Your email address:

Read Latest Issue

Read Latest Issue

Web Exclusives

From our 2004 archive, Boeing invites you to step aboard Flight 960 with Jenny, one of a host of fictional characters that Boeing was using to explore tomorrow's travel experience. Jenny was envisioned as a passenger in 2016, so see how today's experience compares…
Click here to read more

Airbus is consolidating cabin design and the passenger experience across its model range with the Airspace brand, which may just gain airlines a few more ‘likes’ on social media
Click here to read more

The Desire Lines concept has been conceived to shape a new future for the aerospace industry – and for Zodiac Aerospace
Click here to read more

The SportJet isn’t just another concept: this airborne sports clinic is part of Sukhoi’s strategy to boost sales of the SuperJet 100 regional aircraft, and it is ready for team orders
Click here to read more

Could a freighter hold the secret to the next-generation passenger experience? A3, an Airbus outpost in California, believes that with its Transpose concept, it does. Let’s give Transpose a closer look – and a reality check
Click here to read more

Supplier Spotlight

Supplier SpotlightClick here for listings and information on leading suppliers covering all aspects of the aircraft interiors industry. Want to see your company included? Contact for more details.

Submit your industry opinion

Industry BlogDo you have an opinion you'd like to share with the aircraft interiors community? Good or bad, we'd like to hear your views and opinions on the leading issues shaping the industry. Share your comments by sending up to 500 words to

Submit Your Recruitment Ad

Recruitment AdTo send us your recruitment advertising or to receive information on placing a banner please email